{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"FIAT","provider_url":"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/hu","title":"Public opinion as a foundation of\u00a0de facto\u00a0judicial independence?: lessons from Argentina and Uruguay - FIAT","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ClwlGBfeu6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/hu\/populism-reaches-argentina-2-2\/\">A k\u00f6zv\u00e9lem\u00e9ny a de facto b\u00edr\u00f3i f\u00fcggetlens\u00e9g alapja?: Argent\u00edna \u00e9s Uruguay tanuls\u00e1gai<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/hu\/populism-reaches-argentina-2-2\/embed\/#?secret=ClwlGBfeu6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u201eA k\u00f6zv\u00e9lem\u00e9ny mint a de facto b\u00edr\u00f3i f\u00fcggetlens\u00e9g alapja?: Argent\u00edna \u00e9s Uruguay tanuls\u00e1gai\u201d \u2013 FIAT\" data-secret=\"ClwlGBfeu6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/foundations.ac\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Ghuksg3WgAAoDex.jpg","thumbnail_width":904,"thumbnail_height":904,"description":"By Demian Iglesias Seifert, Daniela Rodriguez Gutierrez, and Eoin Carolan Abstract It is anecdotally clear from experiences in various countries that the perception that judicial independence is under threat can mobilise significant public opposition. The extent to which the public may oppose measures that impinge on judicial autonomy has clear implications for de facto judicial [&hellip;]"}