<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>FIAT</provider_name><provider_url>https://foundations.ac/sv</provider_url><title>Public opinion as a foundation of&#xA0;de facto&#xA0;judicial independence?: lessons from Argentina and Uruguay - FIAT</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="9s3V2Wy71s"&gt;&lt;a href="https://foundations.ac/sv/populism-reaches-argentina-2-2/"&gt;Den allm&#xE4;nna opinionen som en grund f&#xF6;r de facto r&#xE4;ttsligt oberoende?: l&#xE4;rdomar fr&#xE5;n Argentina och Uruguay&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://foundations.ac/sv/populism-reaches-argentina-2-2/embed/#?secret=9s3V2Wy71s" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201D;Den allm&#xE4;nna opinionen som grund f&#xF6;r de facto r&#xE4;ttsv&#xE4;sendets oberoende?: l&#xE4;rdomar fr&#xE5;n Argentina och Uruguay&#x201D; &#x2013; FIAT" data-secret="9s3V2Wy71s" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://foundations.ac/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://foundations.ac/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Ghuksg3WgAAoDex.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>904</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>904</thumbnail_height><description>By Demian Iglesias Seifert, Daniela Rodriguez Gutierrez, and Eoin Carolan Abstract It is anecdotally clear from experiences in various countries that the perception that judicial independence is under threat can mobilise significant public opposition. The extent to which the public may oppose measures that impinge on judicial autonomy has clear implications for de facto judicial [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
