{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"FIAT","provider_url":"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/sv","title":"Public opinion as a foundation of\u00a0de facto\u00a0judicial independence?: lessons from Argentina and Uruguay - FIAT","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3Dn9Mm6XMI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/sv\/populism-reaches-argentina-2-2\/\">Den allm\u00e4nna opinionen som en grund f\u00f6r de facto r\u00e4ttsligt oberoende?: l\u00e4rdomar fr\u00e5n Argentina och Uruguay<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/sv\/populism-reaches-argentina-2-2\/embed\/#?secret=3Dn9Mm6XMI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u201dDen allm\u00e4nna opinionen som grund f\u00f6r de facto r\u00e4ttsv\u00e4sendets oberoende?: l\u00e4rdomar fr\u00e5n Argentina och Uruguay\u201d \u2013 FIAT\" data-secret=\"3Dn9Mm6XMI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/foundations.ac\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/foundations.ac\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Ghuksg3WgAAoDex.jpg","thumbnail_width":904,"thumbnail_height":904,"description":"By Demian Iglesias Seifert, Daniela Rodriguez Gutierrez, and Eoin Carolan Abstract It is anecdotally clear from experiences in various countries that the perception that judicial independence is under threat can mobilise significant public opposition. The extent to which the public may oppose measures that impinge on judicial autonomy has clear implications for de facto judicial [&hellip;]"}